12/29/2023 0 Comments Duplicacy change encryption passwordThese are actually recent upgrades – the server was been running on older 1TB Green drives (four and five years old respectively), but one of them started reporting failures (I would speculate the older of the two, but I didn’t check) so I replaced both. I’m not sure how much this matters, but for $25, I went with the extra enclosure). You might be able to find these cheaper – the ones I got were metal, which seemed good in terms of heat dissipation, and have been running for a little over a year straight without a problem (note: this is actually one more than I’m using at any given time, to make it easier to rotate in new drives BTRFS, which I’m using, allows you to just physically remove a drive and add a new one, but the preferred method is to have both attached, and issue a replace command. $75 - Three external USB SATA hard drive enclosures. It’s a tradeoff that they put a much faster processor in these than in prior generations – I think it’s worth it (it’s an amazingly capably computer for the size/price). I ran without it for a while (forgot to install it) and it would overheat and hard lock. Note that you really want a heat-sink on the processor. If you had any of these things, you can probably get a cheaper kit (the single board itself is around $35). That price includes a case, heat-sink, SD card, power adaptor, etc. This consumes very little power (a little over 1W without the disks, probably around 10W with them spinning, more like 3W when they are idling), takes up very little space, but seems plenty fast enough to act as a file server. In particular, setting up and experimenting with the below was much cheaper than dropping hundreds more dollars on a new NAS that may not have worked any better than the old one, and once I had it working, there was certainly no point in going back! Obviously this depends in the particular NAS you get, but the system below is perfect for me. Also, a critical element of this system for me is that there is an off-site component, so getting that software on it is extremely important, and I’d rather have a well-supported linux computer to deal with rather than something esoteric. I wasn’t impressed by the software (which was hard to upgrade, install other stuff on it, maintain, etc), the power consumption (this was several years ago, but idle the two-drive system used over 30watts, which is the same power that my similarly aged quad core workstation uses when idle!). In the past, I tried one (it was a Buffalo model). It’s a combination of some cheap hardware, inexpensive cloud storage, and decent backup software. I’ve tried various solutions, but what I’ve ended up with seems to be working pretty well (most of it has been running for about a year some parts are more recent, and a few have been running for much longer). This is obviously balanced with other concerns (in particular, 2 and 3)! Redundancy across hardware, geographic locations, etc. Anything that’s not in my physical control should be encrypted. Adding & organizing files should be doable without commandline familiarity, so it can serve my whole home. There has to be one place where I can dump files, it has to be simple enough to recover from complete failure of any given piece of hardware even if I haven’t touched it in a long time (because if it is working, I won’t have had to tweak it in months / years). I’m willing to pay about $100-200/year total (including hardware). For me, this is currently about 1TB (+-0.5TB).Ĭheap. What makes up the bulk is photos, some music, and some audio and video files. (Home) scalable – i.e., any reasonable amount of data that I could generate personally I should be able to dump in one place, and be confident that it won’t go away. Different people need different things, but what I need, and have built (hence this post describing the system), fulfills the following requirements: Other files, like photos, or personal documents, generally don’t have a natural redundant home, so they need some backup story, and relying on various online services is risky (what if they go out of business, “pivot”, etc), potentially time-consuming to keep track of (services for photos may not allow videos, or at least not full resolution ones, etc), limited in various ways (max file sizes, storage allotments, etc), not to mention bringing up serious privacy concerns. Some stuff, like code that lives in repositories, may naturally end up in many places, so it perhaps is less important to explicitly back up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |